Rear lower arms

Everythiong related to chassis, suspension, steering, tyres, etc...
Post Reply
peteb
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:01 pm
Are you a Stylus owner?: yes
Location: Towcester, Northants

Rear lower arms

Post by peteb »

Evening all, just got back on the stylus after ages away from it (little tip, buying a house and building a stylus don't mix!). Anyway, I'm trying to make some wheel arch liners for the rear and need to know how much wheel travel to expect. I've still got the straight lower arms on the car, although I'll probably upgrade to bent lower arms/longer shocks eventually. Does anyone know how much more travel I can expect from the longer shocks so I can allow clearance to the liner?
Cheers
Pete
stylussprinter
Stylus owner
Posts: 3772
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:49 pm
Are you a Stylus owner?: yes
Location: ASTON CLINTON BUCKS

Re: Rear lower arms

Post by stylussprinter »

peteb wrote:Evening all, just got back on the stylus after ages away from it (little tip, buying a house and building a stylus don't mix!). Anyway, I'm trying to make some wheel arch liners for the rear and need to know how much wheel travel to expect. I've still got the straight lower arms on the car, although I'll probably upgrade to bent lower arms/longer shocks eventually. Does anyone know how much more travel I can expect from the longer shocks so I can allow clearance to the liner?
Cheers
Pete
It depends entirely on your spring lbs and passenger or not :wink: Originally 130lbs springs were fitted to the rear which were totally inadequate .
To give you a starting point from which you can assess your own car --- my rears are 250lbs and they deflect around 30mm's under extreme circuit provocation .
With say -- 180's plus passenger , deflection could be around 75mm's , it really does depend on how you're driving the car , particularly through corners :wink:

No one I know has inner guards fitted to the rear arches --- some have painted ruberoid substances where stones could fly up from the treads :roll:
I just love the Stylus but she keeps swallowing £££ !
Alfa Red 159 2.4 jtdm ti 260bhp 365lbft / BilsteinB12 + Adjustable Powerflex camber/castor bushes. Red STYLUS 2lt zetec 231bhp 185lbft Dunnell . RED 1972 Alfa 2lt GTAm replica 170bhp.
peteb
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 11:01 pm
Are you a Stylus owner?: yes
Location: Towcester, Northants

Re: Rear lower arms

Post by peteb »

I think that wheel arch liners on the front are required for SVA and assumed this was the same for the rear, sounds like this isn't the case which saves me a job. :D
stylussprinter
Stylus owner
Posts: 3772
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 8:49 pm
Are you a Stylus owner?: yes
Location: ASTON CLINTON BUCKS

Re: Rear lower arms

Post by stylussprinter »

peteb wrote:I think that wheel arch liners on the front are required for SVA and assumed this was the same for the rear, sounds like this isn't the case which saves me a job. :D
You might just be confusing front wheel to engine guards with wheel arch liners :?:
It's a very long time since I SVA'd mine so perhaps you should ask a more recent builder re -- IVA which it now is :roll:
Attachments
progress 558.jpg
I just love the Stylus but she keeps swallowing £££ !
Alfa Red 159 2.4 jtdm ti 260bhp 365lbft / BilsteinB12 + Adjustable Powerflex camber/castor bushes. Red STYLUS 2lt zetec 231bhp 185lbft Dunnell . RED 1972 Alfa 2lt GTAm replica 170bhp.
User avatar
alecmartin19
Stylus owner
Posts: 280
Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 10:56 am
Location: gloucester

Re: Rear lower arms

Post by alecmartin19 »

i don't have rear wheel arch liners at all on my car. i haven't even painted the arches and also the front i do not have any. only something that attaches the lower part of the bodywork to the chassis rail to stop the body flexing where it was cut for the flip front
Post Reply