You haven't twigged my own spec -- springs250lbs/own weight 81kgs/spring deflection 15mm's----- which is ' actual ' figures. These advised settings etc come from 12 yrs competition and continuous testing. If my weight on those spring lbs deflects 15mm's in my 600kgs car ---- there has to be another explanation for his figures , particularly as his Stylus may well weigh moreBikenuts wrote:Rob (Stylussprinter)18st is near enough 250lbs, the damper/ wheel ratio on a Stylus is near enough 1:1 all round so 250 lbs is enough to depress one of his rear springs by 1" or both by 1/2"so even allowing for the majority of the drivers weight being distributed over the rear wheels I wouldn't expect the ride height to change by more than about the 3/8" (10mm) Rob (CMA) is seeing.
If the front feels nicely planted and the rear loose then softer and or lower at the rear is the way to look. Did I read right that you have 250lbs all round? most people seem to run the front about 10%-20% harder than the rear so it might be worth looking at 200 or 225lbs for the back.
Bikenuts
I started off 12 yrs ago with the exact same spec as every body else 180lbs front 130lbs rear and AVO 13/90's shocks on 9inch springs. The factory then very slowly caught up with my development of moving through 200 , 225 , 250 then 285lbs fronts and ARB. Same at the rear , 180 , 200 , 225 , 250lbs plus testing '' rake '' to control balance --- all for my car and my weight , measured by my lap times at various tracks for 12 to 15 events per year .
The factory only changed to dipped rear links after Tim arrived and convinced Pete of the real cause for rear links bending ---- me having said the same for years before ie. piston travel/shocks not enough.(but then Tim could drive )
Point I'm making is that my advice to others isn't theoretical -- it comes from a lot of work and money spent finding out. If I can help people to avoid that process , especially if they don't compete , then I'm pleased to do it.